pr-writing-review

Extract explicit writing suggestions and plain-text reviewer feedback from a GitHub pull request.
Compare first and final versions of text files to identify reviewer-driven editorial changes.
Group observed changes into style categories such as clarity, precision, tone, structure, grammar, and content.

Writing suggestions grouped by reviewer, including original and suggested text, reviewer notes, and GitHub permalinks.
Plain reviewer feedback comments tagged with GitHub links.
With `--diff`, explicit suggestion pairs, reviewer feedback, and first/final versions for `.md`, `.txt`, `.rst`, and `.mdx` files.
With `--json`, raw JSON; `file_evolutions` is included when using `--diff` without `--no-files`.

Only inline pull-request review comments are extracted; issue comments and the pull-request description are not included.
Extremely long files can still be heavy; lower `--max-file-chars` or use `--no-files`.
Confirm `gh auth status` shows an authenticated session before extracting a pull request.
Use `--diff` when the review requires first-to-final text comparison.
Use `--max-file-chars N` when first/final file dumps need truncation.
Use `--no-files` with `--diff` when only suggestion and feedback summaries are needed.
Verify that feedback is mapped to the relevant first-draft and final-version sections before drawing style lessons.

AI 搜索